Hoarding: How to Help a Loved One Declutter

The issue of hoarding has recently gathered a great deal of attention, particularly due to news reports and popular television shows.  However, hoarding is not a new or a small problem. The problem of hoarding has been documented since the turn of the century and is thought to significantly affect nearly 15 million Americans, many of them elderly. A great article recently appeared in the Boston Hearald dealing with the clinical aspects of Hoarding.  Unfortunately, research has been lacking in this area – until now.

On July 14, 2010, a Bellingham, Massachusetts couple and their dog were found dead in their home.  The ultimate factor in their deaths: hoarding.  Authorities deduced that 75-year-old Richard Lamphere tripped on a pile of trash, fell on top of his wife, 62-year-old Susan Abraham and one of their dogs.  Lamphere died instantly from head injuries; Abraham was severely injured in the fall and died later from her wounds.  Police confirmed that the couple were hoarders.  They had trash and belongings piled everywhere inside their home.  The conditions were uninhabitable and clearly unsafe. For the full story, see this article.

When assessing the severity of a loved one’s hoarding situation, several questions are important to remember:

• Can the occupant access doors in case of an emergency?
• Does he have access to the kitchen to prepare and store food?
• Can he access the bathroom facilities? Can the bathtub/shower be utilized?
• Can the resident safely reach their bed or have they made other sleeping arrangements?
• Are the home’s mechanical systems in working order (electrical, plumbing, heating)?
• Are pets being cared for?
• What health hazards are present (mold, decaying food, bodily waste, etc.)

If the basic needs of an occupant cannot be met, then it is time to consider intervention.

The difficulty with trying to help a hoarder is that most of them do not seek or want any “help”.  In fact, hoarders typically do not comprehend that they actually have a problem.  Thus, attempts to “clean out” or assist a loved one in “tidying up” his or her home should be done with care and patience.  And, although perhaps difficult, refrain from making judgments.

Tips to aiding someone who hoards include encouraging them and helping them establish new relationships.  Gently remind them that their grandchildren will be able to come and visit if they clean their house.  Perhaps it is time to participate in a local community activity for seniors.  If they are busy with other activities or plans, then getting rid of “stuff” may seem less consequential to them.  Many local companies specialize in professional, home organziation and cleanouts. Additionally, you may look into a hiring a certified home maker a few hours a week to keep up with housework and tackle clutter habits.

As a last resort, do not be afraid to contact the authorities or professional help.  Let someone else be the “bad guy”.  The story of a local hoarder who has made progress over the years can be found here.

Finally, a temporary or limited Guardianship may be necessary, at least until improvements can be made for the individual’s overall safety.   For more information and advice contact your local Elder Services or area Agency/Council on Aging.

Letting Software or Online Service Plan Your Estate: Is It Worth the Risk?

There are several websites that offer customized, do-it-yourself wills and other estate planning documents. These computer-based services appear to offer the consumer a cost-effective and convenient alternative to visiting an Estate
Planning or Elder Law attorney. Or do they? Is online estate planning worth the convenience and initial savings? How do the documents created compare to those that a qualified attorney would produce?

To answer these questions, ElderLawAnswers asked two experienced Estate Planning and Elder Law attorneys to evaluate three leading online will preparation and estate planning programs: Nolo’s Online Will, BuildaWill, and LegalZoom. Their findings and ElderLawAnswers’ conclusions are presented in a five-page whitepaper that is available for free on ElderLawAnswers website.

The conclusion: “We conclude that while online estate planning could possibly work for people who have little or no property, small savings or investments, and a traditional family tree, the significant remainder of the population should not rest easy using one of these programs and should instead consult with a qualified Estate Planning attorney. In other words, in all but the most commonplace Estate Planning situations (and only an attorney can determine what is “commonplace”), do-it-yourself estate planning programs can be a risky, and often quite costly, substitute for in-person planning with an experienced estate planning attorney.”

I encourage you to read the whitepaper and see for yourself. Common issues with these type of estate plans include oversimplification. For example they do not explain the complexities of naming too many decision makers to serve at the same time, nor do they explain why a minor child or an elder parent may not be a good choice to name as an agent. They often overlook tax laws. Its important to remember that each State’s probate laws and tax laws vary. Further, mixed marriage situations are never a good fit for these programs. Additionally, users may miss powerful opportunities to sheild a child’s inheritance or plan for a special needs child. Finally, there is the issue of liability. Who do you hold accountable if a mistake was made?

In my office alone, I have several consultations per month where I assist clients in backing out of poorly drafted, do-it-yourself estate plans, and into something that makes sense for them and their families. Its very important to remember that there are no one-size-fits-all when it comes to planning one’s estate but that the utmost care should be placed in choosing the right person (Estate Planning or Elder Law Attorney) to help you, and not the right computer program.

More Protection Than a Health Care Proxy Alone?! MOLST- a Pilot Program in Worcester

Some people think that Elder Law and Estate Planning attorneys are only useful further down the road. They think, “I’m healthy. I don’t need to worry about those things now.” Even while you are healthy, there is one document that everyone over the age of 18 should have in place: a Health Care Proxy (HCP). A health care proxy is necessary to ensure that someone, a health care agent, will be available to make medical decisions for you if you are unable to make them on your own because you are incapacitated. Currently, in Worcester County, another form is also worth considering: the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form. This medical order works with the HCP to inform your health care agent and your doctors what you actually want to happen in various circumstances.

In April 2008, the Massachusetts Health Care Quality and Cost Council (MHCQCC) issued its annual report recommending that Massachusetts establish a pilot program to improve communication between patients and clinicians, and other interested parties, regarding end of life treatments. The MHCQCC found that many patients nearing the end of life were unaware of the treatment options available to them, or, if patients had been aware of such treatment options and had discussed them with their doctors previously, nothing was in place to ensure that their preferences were honored. Therefore, the Massachusetts legislature enacted legislation in August 2008 establishing a demonstrative program for the MOLST process in one community in Massachusetts: Worcester. (Yay, Worcester!)

The MOLST form is fairly simple and easy to read; the most difficult part is actually making the decisions and putting them down on paper. The form is only two pages long, and only two sections must be completed in order for the form to be honored. These two sections are Section D (patient information – specifically who is signing the document on behalf of the patient) and Section E (physician information). In   Section D, it is possible for the patient, the patient’s health care proxy, or the patient’s guardian to sign on his or her behalf. If a guardian is signing for the patient, the guardian must ensure that s/he has the legal authority under the guardian appointment to do so. This may require consultation with the patient or guardian’s Elder Law attorney.

If any other section of the form is not filled out, the health care agent is not limited in his or her decisions for life-sustaining treatment for the patient. Sections A, B, C, and F ask the difficult questions regarding resuscitation, intubation and ventilation, hospitalization, respiratory support, dialysis support, and artificial nutrition and hydration. It is critical that you speak with a physician before making these decisions so that you fully understand the meanings of the terms used and the potential consequences. Once these sections are filled out, they must be honored by all health care professions in Massachusetts, where clinically appropriate. The MOLST form is different from a Living Will or another document expressing your “final wishes” because it carries more authority and is more likely to be honored. A Living Will or final wishes document is only used by health care professionals to keep your wishes in mind when making decisions about treatment. While the MOLST form is not currently legally binding, health care professionals are strongly encouraged by the state to honor it.

Finally, Section G simply asks for the contact information of the health care agent. There is also room on the form for other treatment preferences, in which you can more clearly articulate your wishes. There is an expectation that the form will be reviewed throughout the patient’s life so that if his or her preferences change, those preferences will still be honored.

View a sample MOLST form here.

MOLST in Massachusetts from Commonwealth Medicine on Vimeo.

Massachusetts’ Seniors May Consider Filing Tax Returns for Circuit Breaker Credit Refunds

As we all know, tax season has been in full swing for many weeks now, and it is almost over for some. But, did you know that even if you did not have to file a tax return, as a senior, it may be beneficial for you to do so? Did you know there is a tax credit only available to seniors in Massachusetts who pay rent or real estate taxes? There is, and it is called the Circuit Breaker Tax Credit. Even if you don’t owe any taxes at all, you may be eligible for this credit, and it is just like money in your pocket (Certain counties in Massachusetts, including Worcester and Middlesex, have had tax deadlines extended to May 15th, because they have been declared Federal Disaster Areas due to the recent floodings).

The Circuit Breaker Tax Credit is meant to help low to moderate income seniors whose real estate taxes or rent take up at least 10% of their income. Both you, and your spouse, if you are married, must be age 65 or older as of December 31, 2009, and if you are married, you must file a joint return in order to qualify for this credit. No one else can claim you as a dependent, and you must rent or own a home in Massachusetts as your principle residence. This means that if your principle residence is in Florida, you are not eligible for this credit. You are also not eligible if your rent is paid through a federal or state subsidy.

The income limits to qualify for this credit are relatively high, which is a good thing because it means many seniors in Massachusetts can take advantage of it. If you are filing as a single adult, your income must be below $51,000; if you are filing as head of household, your income must be below $64,000; and if you are married filing jointly, your combined income must be below $77,000. Remember, though, that your rent or real estate taxes must be at least 10% of your income in order to qualify. So, if you are married filing jointly and your income is $75,000, your rent or real estate taxes must be more than $7,500. Also, be aware that income here includes social security, retirement, pensions, annuities, and other nontaxable sources.

If you have not yet filed your taxes, and you are interested in filing so that you can take advantage of this credit, there are many organizations that offer free tax assistance. The Circuit Breaker Tax Credit form is easy to fill out, and if it is the only reason you want to file a return, you should not pay a paid professional. In Worcester, there are four VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) sites, and volunteers at these sites would be happy to prepare a return for you. This is a free service, and contact information for the sites is listed below. You can also visit your local library to pick up the forms you need (Massachusetts Form 1 and Schedule CB), or visit this website to file your return electronically on your own. Finally, if you have not taken advantage of this credit before, you can file Massachusetts Form CA-6 (Application for Abatement/Amended Return) and Schedule CB to obtain the credit for the past three years.

In these hard economic times, we need all the help we can get. If you are over age 65 and more than 10% of your income goes to rent or real estate taxes, take advantage of this credit. The maximum credit amount for 2009 is $960, which is a good chunk of change right in your pocket.

Worcester Community Action Council Inc.
Last day open: April 14th
484 Main Street, Suite 320
Worcester, MA 01608
508 754-1176

Plumley Village
Last day open: April 13th
16 Laurel Street
Worcester, MA 01608
508 770-0508

Main South Community Development Corp
Last day open: April 14th
875 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01610
508 752-6181

Worcester State College
Last day open: April 15th
Sullivan Building, 2nd Floor, Room 220
486 Chandler Street
Worcester, MA 01602
508 929-8635

Antipsychotic Drug Use for Dementia Should be Closely Monitored by Doctors & Family Members

Are you a family member or guardian of someone that suffers from dementia? Is s/he living in a nursing home? Do you know what medications s/he is taking? Do you know what the dosages are? When was the last time those medications were reevaluated to determine if they are helping in any way, or if they are even necessary? These are all important questions to keep in mind and to continue asking the administrators of the nursing home and the physicians who care for your loved one.

On March 10, 2010, Massachusetts joined a federal suit against Johnson & Johnson for paying millions of dollars in kickbacks to Omnicare, Inc., the largest pharmacy in the US that specializes in providing drugs to nursing home facilities. United States Attorney Carmen Ortiz argues in the complaint that substantial monetary kickbacks can be especially harmful in the nursing home context because nursing home patients have little to no control over the medical care they receive. He states: “Nursing home doctors should be able to rely on the integrity of the recommendations they receive from pharmacists, and those recommendations should not be a product of money that a drug company is paying to the pharmacy.”

The primary drug at issue in this case is Risperdal, an antipsychotic drug that is usually prescribed for patients with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia. It is legal to prescribe antipsychotics for “off label” uses to treat people with dementia, but these drugs may also raise the risk of death among such patients. At the same time, antipsychotics can help patients with dementia suffering from extreme agitation and sleeplessness. When prescribed in small doses, these drugs can actually have amazing effects on making the lives of patients with dementia more bearable. However, it is important that the prescriptions and dosages be reevaluated regularly to determine their effectiveness and potential harm to the patient.

On March 8, 2010, the Boston Globe reported that 2,483 nursing home residents in Massachusetts were treated with powerful antipsychotic drugs in 2009. This data was collected by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medical Services, and Massachusetts has the 12^th highest rate in the nation for nursing home patients on antipsychotic drugs. While these statistics may appear alarming at first glance, any good researcher knows they don’t paint the whole picture. Many patients with dementia are only put on small doses that do not harm them in order to lower their agitation and improve their sleeping habits, but it is also critical not to simply overlook these statistics. As noted earlier, two after the data was published in the Boston Globe, Massachusetts joined an important federal suit against one of the drug companies that promotes these potentially harmful practices.

It is extremely important to be educated and informed regularly about the drugs your loved one is taking, especially if s/he is in a nursing home. While issues concerning antipsychotic drugs are currently making headlines, it will take individual conversations to ensure that your loved ones are being treated appropriately. Sometimes antipsychotic drugs are extremely beneficial for a patient with dementia, but if not administered properly, they can also be very damaging. Open communications between you, the patient, the patient’s guardian (if that is not you), the patient’s primary care physician, and the administrators at the nursing home s/he lives at, will make it possible to ensure that your loved one is on the right medication so that s/he is safe and comfortable.

When it Could be OK to Give Assets Away When Planning for Long Term Care (Nursing Home)

Not long ago, I posted a blog on gift transfers and their affect on qualification for MassHealth (Medicaid) for an institutionalized individual. Generally, transferring assets to dispose of property so that you qualify for MassHealth will not actually help you qualify because the state imposes a five-year “look-back” period, in which those assets are counted and used to assess eligibility for MassHealth. Fortunately, there are some exceptions to the general rule.

Under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, an individual may still be eligible for MassHealth if certain assets were transferred to specific individuals. One of your biggest assets is probably your home. You can transfer title to your home to the following individuals without it being counted and without subjecting you to the 5-year look-back period: (1) your spouse; (2) your child who is under age 21, or is blind or permanently disabled; (3) your brother or sister who has lived with you for at least one whole year prior to the day you entered an institution and holds an equity interest in the home; or (4) your “caregiver” child.

A “caregiver” child is a son or daughter that lived with you for the two whole years prior to the date you entered an institution and provided the care you needed to remain in your home. If you were healthy enough to live in your home without your child’s help, a transfer of your home to that child will not protect you from the transfer rules. All other assets can also be transferred without being counted or subjecting you to the 5-year look-back period if they are transferred correctly and fall within the other exceptions to the general rule.

Any and all assets can be transferred to your spouse or to someone else for the sole benefit of your spouse. Your spouse may also transfer any and all of the assets to someone else for the sole benefit of your spouse. This means that someone else would hold legal title to the property, but it would only be used for the needs and wishes of your spouse.

Assets may also be transferred to your child if he or she is blind or permanently disabled. You have the option of transferring such assets directly to your child or to a trust for the sole benefit of your child. Either way, these gifts would not be subject to the new transfer rules.

Finally, you may transfer any and all of your assets to a trust for the sole benefit of any disabled person under age 65. Under this exception, a disabled individual is someone whose mental or physical impairment is so severe that he or she will be unable to perform substantial gainful work in order to provide for him or herself. This mental or physical impairment must be expected either to result in death, or to last continuously for a period of at least one year. There is no statutory requirement that you be related to this disabled individual for your transfers to fall within the exception.

While exceptions to the general rule on transfers of gifts do exist, it is very important that you speak with an attorney before making any transfers to ensure that you will still qualify for MassHealth. The 5-year look-back period is a long time to wait to be eligible for the services you need.

Safe Driving Bill Approved by Massachusetts House of Representatives

On February 4, 2010, the House of Representatives in Massachusetts amended and approved a bill dealing with safe driving in the Commonwealth. If passed by the Massachusetts Senate, this bill will have a direct impact on the senior citizens of Massachusetts because it will require drivers over the age of 75 to renew their licenses every 5 years instead of every 10 years.

Issues concerning elderly driving have been in the news on and off for many years now, but after a series of accidents involving elder drivers last year, the state legislature is looking to make some changes. The current bill does not just involve seniors though. It also seeks to completely ban text messaging by all drivers, and it provides for higher penalties for drivers under the age of 18 who are caught using cell phones while driving.

For seniors, the requisite 5-year renewal will include passing a vision test that will be administered at the local branch of the registry of motor vehicles. However, the bill would permit the registrar to create regulations allowing seniors to submit a vision screening certificate, signed by an optometrist or ophthalmologist that asserts they meet the minimum vision requirements to hold a driver’s license.

This bill further seeks to allow health care providers to notify the registry of anyone over the age of 16 whose cognitive or functional impairments make it unsafe for them to drive. Decisions regarding whether to revoke a license will depend more on the effects of the cognitive or functional impairment, rather than simply on the diagnosis of such impairment. More detailed regulations will be drafted by the registry with the assistance of various health care professionals, and any reports filed under this section of the proposed law would remain confidential.

Finally, this bill seeks to codify a rule that drivers of any passenger vehicle shall not use mobile telephones, hands-free mobile telephones, or any other mobile electronic devices while driving on duty.This section was drafted in response to the rising number of accidents involving the T in recent years where drivers were text messaging, or using mobile electronic devices in other ways.

Now that the House has published and amended the safe driving bill, it moves on to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means. State Senator Stephen M. Brewer, is one member of the Ways and Means Committee, and he represents parts of Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, and Franklin. If you are interested in voicing your opinion on this bill, call Mr. Brewer at (617) 722-1540, or email him at Stephen.Brewer@state.ma.us.Click here for the full text of the current bill.

Proposed Massachusetts Legislation Could Change the Way Assets are Counted for MassHealth

How often do you feel like you know what your state legislators are doing? The whole process can be mysterious and confusing. This week I would like to shed some light on the subject and tell you about a potentially helpful piece of legislation currently pending in the Massachusetts state legislature.

The proposed law would change the way assets are counted when determining whether a spouse in a nursing home, or certain other institutions and community based programs, is eligible for medical assistance through MassHealth (Medicaid). For MassHealth purposes, the spouse in the nursing home is called the “institutionalized spouse” and the spouse still living at home is referred to as the “community spouse.” Currently, under Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 118E, subsection 21A, many different types of income and asset types of both spouses are considered countable for purposes of determining eligibility. The total amount of countable income and assets are major factors the Division of Medical Assistance takes into account when determining if the institutionalized spouse is eligible for medical assistance from the Commonwealth (MassHealth/Medicaid).

The proposed legislation, sponsored in the State House by Representative Alice Peisch, and sponsored in the State Senate by Senator James Eldridge, would alter the language in the statute to make some assets that are currently countable, no longer countable. The proposals in both houses are identical. The proposed legislation would make any money held by the community spouse in an IRA, Keogh plan, or other pension fund non-countable assets as long as regular income distributions are made from the fund OR the community spouse is employed. This means that those assets would not affect the institutionalized spouse’s eligibility for medical assistance. This would come in handy in lots of potential situations, but especially in situations like a spouse in their 50’s suffering from early onset dementia, where the community spouse is still working. Many spouses in their 50’s, 60’s, and even early 70’s still work and more importantly have to work to make ends meet.

This change in the law would also be hugely beneficial to aging couples who have worked hard and diligently saved their money. If one spouse is institutionalized, the community spouse still needs to have the means for adequate support. No one should be penalized for following their financial planner’s advice and putting money away for retirement. In this system, frivolity and impoverishment would no longer be the only path to assistance from MassHealth.

The proposed legislation has been referred to the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, and a public hearing is scheduled for June 3, 2010, at 1:00, in Hearing Room B1. If you are interested in learning more, contact State Senator James Eldridge. He represents parts of Middlesex and Worcester county. Most importantly, if you would like to see this legislation passed, contact your own local representative and express your support.

What about Fluffy? Pet Trusts: Another Important Estate Planning Tool

It’s estimated that two-thirds of American households currently have at least one pet, a number that has steadily increased in the last 60 years. With more pets comes a growing industry devoted to helping Americans better care for, and even indulge, their pets, has developed. Businesses that provide pet day care, pet sitters, grooming, spa services, and even pet cemeteries have become common.

Many even consider pets part of their family, a sort of child, brother, sister, or at the very least, friend. Since so much love and attention is given to these fury and feathery companions, many wish to provide for their animals in the event that they become incapacitated or die before their pet. With family greed, skepticism, and fraud on the rise, many seek a better solution than hoping Junior will “do the right thing.” As a matter of fact, owner death and/or disability is one of the top reasons that animals end up in Shelters across the country.

Several states have made changes to their laws to help people provide for the care of their pets after the owner’s death, thereby statutorily allowing for “Pet Trusts.” Pet trusts can be useful in a number of situations. Should the owner of a pet die, a pet trust can ensure that the pet continues to be taken care of, provided a home, food, and veterinary care. A properly-funded pet trust can give an owner peace of mind that should something happen to them, their pet will continue to be cared for, and not end up in an animal shelter or otherwise abandoned.

Forty states currently have pet trust laws on the books. Sadly though, Massachusetts is not one of them (Start writing those letters to your Representative). However, that doesn’t mean that you can’t provide for “Mr. Droolsalot” and “Fluffy Von Furball” when you pass in Massachusetts.

Should you choose an intervivos trust, one that exists outside of your Will, you’ll need to be very specific as to what your money can and can’t be spent on for your pet’s care. In states with pet trust legislation, you are able to leave many of the details to the statute. Depending on how you fund your trust, it can be effective on your disability, incapacity, or death.

You also have the option of choosing a testamentary trust, one that exists within your Will itself. This option is often less expensive than an intervivos trust, however the trust is not in existence until after your passing and therefore does not protect the pet if you were to enter a nursing home or were otherwise incapacitated. Both of these options can be accomplished by adding an extra clause or two to your existing documents.

It is important to remember to have an attorney experienced in estate planning for pets prepare or update your documents. If your current attorney doesn’t take you seriously when you indicate your desire to care for you animals, they may not have YOUR best interests in mind. Estate planning is intimately personal and cookie-cutter plans should not be accepted.

Top photo courtesty of Maggie Smith. Bottom photo courtesy of my cat, Mr. Griffin.

Irrevocable Trusts & the Current Federal Estate Tax (IRC 1022), Friend or Foe?

The following is a repost of a blog recently written by Attorney Dale Krause of Krause Financial Services. Attorney Krause is also a fellow member of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA). The original version can be found here.

An Irrevocable Trust can offer a grantor lifetime control over his or her assets of the trust is established with the following provisions:

• All taxable income shall be disbursed to the grantor;
• The grantor shall have the right to direct how the trust assets are held or reinvested; and
• The grantor shall have a limited power of appointment over the final distributions of the trust; this power shall be in favor of a limited class of beneficiaries, consisting of the grantor’s children and grandchildren; the disbursements do not have to be in equal amounts or shares.

After the trust is established, totally funded, and 60 months passes, the grantor can qualify for Medicaid benefits. None of the trust assets will be included in the grantor’s Medicaid application, in that they are outside of the 60 month look-back period for uncompensated transfers. The grantor will qualify for Medicaid benefits with generally his or her personal property, a prepaid funeral plan, and $2,000.00, or less, of cash assets.

Medicaid eligibility will require that the grantor pay substantially all of his or her monthly income to the nursing home, including that received from Social Security, any pension, and the trust. The only monthly income retained by the grantor is a personal needs allowance, which amount is designed to provide him or her with toiletries and other personal items. Nationally, the personal needs allowance ranges between $30.00 to $101.10.

From an income tax viewpoint, in that the grantor retained all the taxable income, and a limited power of appointment over the final distributions of the trust, the trust is deemed a “grantor trust.” See IRC 671-679. Grantor trusts do not pay any income taxes. Instead, the income flows directly out of the trusts to the grantor, to be placed on their personal income tax returns. For many, the end result is a lower total tax, in that the trust tax rates for individuals are much lower than those for non-grantor trusts.

From an income planning standpoint, in that the grantor retained the right to direct the investment of trust assets, the income taxes can be minimized, or totally eliminated, if the trustee is directed to invest the trust assets in tax-deferred annuities. No income is recognized from a tax-deferred annuity until the trustee either elects to take a withdrawal or annuitize the product.

From a gift tax viewpoint, again, since the grantor retained all taxable income, and a limited power of appointment over the final distributions of the trust, these provisions prevent the funding of the trust from being treated as a “completed gift.” See IRC 2036(a)(10). The end result is that without a taxable gift, no gift tax will be due, nor the requirement that a gift tax return be completed and filed.

Finally, from an estate tax viewpoint, in that the transaction is being treated not as a completed gift, the trust assets will be included in the grantor’s gross estate. The end result is that certain trust assets will receive an automatic step-up in basis. See IRC 1014(a). For example, if a grantor paid $50,000.00 for a house, and made lifetime improvements of $25,000.00, his or her cost basis is $75,000.00. At the time of the grantor’s death, assuming it occurred prior to 2010, if the house was worth $250,000.00, the beneficiaries would receive a tax basis of $250,000.00. Thus, if they later sold it for $250,000.00, or less, they would not owe any capital gains tax. The sale would be tax-free. However, as a result of IRC 1014(a) being repealed on December 31, 2009, the aforementioned tax result will not take place. Instead, if the grantor’s death occurs in 2010, the beneficiaries will receive a tax basis of $75,000.00 – which is likely to result in the payment of capital gains tax when the property is later sold. The present law states that each trust asset will receive a basis equal to the adjusted basis of the property in the hands of the grantor/decedent, or its fair market value on the grantor/decedent’s date of death, whichever is lesser. See IRC 1022.